Décroissance how the French counter capitalism .pdf
Nom original: Décroissance_ how the French counter capitalism.pdfTitre: Décroissance: how the French counter capitalismAuteur: Nico&Kerstin
Ce document au format PDF 1.4 a été généré par PDFCreator Version 0.9.9 / GPL Ghostscript 8.70, et a été envoyé sur fichier-pdf.fr le 03/11/2011 à 18:35, depuis l'adresse IP 80.121.x.x.
La présente page de téléchargement du fichier a été vue 1092 fois.
Taille du document: 59 Ko (2 pages).
Confidentialité: fichier public
Aperçu du document
Page 1 of 2
October 14, 2011 7:31 pm
Décroissance: how the French counter
By Christopher Caldwell
The French philosopher Jean-Claude Michéa asked an uncomfortable question on
television last week: Why were the French mourning the death of Apple founder
Steve Jobs with such inconsolable intensity? Mr Michéa said nothing to detract
from Mr Jobs’s achievements. He asked why the early death of a gifted
businessman was being viewed as a “planetary catastrophe” and tried to find an
answer. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former IMF chairman, remarked several
months ago that three ideals lay at the core of socialism: hope, the future and
innovation. Mr Jobs embodied those more than anyone. Mr Michéa found it bizarre
that the ideals of the left should be identical to those of cutting edge businessmen.
Entrepreneurial capitalism is not just a skill our society has mastered, it is at the
heart of our system of values.
There have lately been signs in France of resistance to those values. One is the
popularity of Mr Michéa’s books. Another is Arnaud Montebourg’s surprisingly
good finish in last Sunday’s Socialist primaries. Mr Montebourg took almost a fifth
of the vote on a programme of “deglobalisation” and resistance to finance
capitalism and free trade. But probably the most profound current running against
the capitalist stream is that of the décroissance (“decrease”) movement. Economic
growth has done enough damage to our planet, says a coalition of activists. Not only
must it stop, it must be reversed.
The currents that make up décroissance have been around a while. It shares a
pantheon of heroes with the 1960s counterculture: the Christian social thinker
Jacques Ellul, the anti-industrial German philosopher Günther Anders and, above
all, the Romanian-American utopian theorist Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen.
Entropia, the quarterly review of décroissant thinking, traces the movement’s roots
back to the early 19th-century British loom-smashers known as Luddites. “What is
urgent,” Philippe Ariès, a theorist of the movement, told the website Rue89
recently, “is a reconstitution of the anti-productivist left”.
Mr Ariès’s views echo those of Stéphane Hessel, the 94-year-old former Resistance
fighter, whose brochure Indignez-Vous has headed the bestseller lists for more than
a year now. When France was flat on its back at the end of the second world war,
both men argue, the Resistance was able to call for a social security system. Why is
France now dismantling that system, even though the country is producing more
Page 2 of 2
wealth than 65 years ago? It is a rather stupid question: the growth of benefits has
outstripped the growth in wealth, to the point where decisions must now be made
about what is affordable.
Décroissance is a kind of environmentalism, but it is more than that. An important
intellectual underpinning of the movement is the idea that gross domestic product
is a deficient yardstick for economic performance and growth. It doesn’t measure
the degradation of the environment as lost wealth, nor distinguish between
productive economic activity and pointless (or destructive) make-work. And we
now know that the huge role of debt in a growth-obsessed economy makes any
measurement of its size untrustworthy.
During the Socialist primary, Mr Montebourg was often described as the “furthest
left” of the candidates. But he is better thought of as an anti-establishment
candidate. His proudest boast was that he was the only candidate to have voted
against the European Union’s constitutional referendum in 2005, and his appeal on
some points is not so distant from that of the far-right Marine Le Pen. In an age of
debt, the establishment right and left differ mainly on what mix of tax rises and
services cuts to impose to make ends meet.
The décroissance movement is similarly disrespectful of leftwing and rightwing
credentials. John Maynard Keynes is for them a figure of the right, since they
favour “real” economic growth over the make-work they associate with stimulus
programmes. They view the greens who favour “sustainable development” as
similarly misled. The knowledge economy may require fewer smokestacks than the
industrial economy, but it requires more computers, and these deplete rare earths
and other commodities. Daniel Cohn-Bendit, hero of 1968 and of today’s Greens, is
a bogeyman of décroissance.
A more important question than whether décroissance belongs to the left or the
right is whether it belongs to the world we knew before the 2008 financial crisis or
to the world after. On one hand, growth seems more imperative than ever – last
month Barack Obama suspended the enforcement of a list of environmental
regulations, hoping to wring a few more jobs out of a straitened US economy. On
the other hand, the past few years show economies can contract even without
The writer is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard
Printed from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2c6a6306-f58c-11e0-94b1-00144feab49a.html
Print a single copy of this article for personal use. Contact us if you wish to print more to distribute to others.
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2011 FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.