Carpe Diem Report.pdf
Aperçu texte
0.8
moderate fcts
best 2009
2009
best
bbob - f1-f5, 5-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances
BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA
0.6
A2 Carped
Carp
A2
0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2
0.2
0.0
0
0.0.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BFGS
BFGS
Proportion of function+target pairs
Proportion of function+target pairs
separable fcts
1.0
1.0
0.8
BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA
0.6
A2 Carped
Carp
A2
0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2
0.2
0.0
0
8
0.0.0
1
log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)
2
bbob - f10-f14, 5-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances
BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA
0.6
A2 Carped
Carp
A2
0.4
BFGS
BFGS
0.2
0.0
0
0.0.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
A2
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
1.0
0.8
0.4
BFGS
BFGS
0.0.0
3
4
5
6
7
log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)
A2
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
8
Proportion of function+target pairs
Proportion of function+target pairs
A2 Carped
Carp
A2
0.2
best 2009
2009
best
A2 Carped
Carp
A2
0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2
0.2
0.0.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BFGS
BFGS
8
all functions
0.6
2
BFGS
BFGS
8
log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)
best 2009
2009
best
1
7
0.6
0.0
0
8
BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA
bbob - f20-f24, 5-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances
0.0
0
6
BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA
log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)
0.8
5
bbob - f15-f19, 5-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances
weakly structured multi-modal fcts
1.0
4
multi-modal fcts
best 2009
2009
best
Proportion of function+target pairs
Proportion of function+target pairs
0.8
3
log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)
ill-conditioned fcts
1.0
best 2009
2009
best
bbob - f6-f9, 5-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances
1.0
0.8
best 2009
2009
best
bbob - f1-f24, 5-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances
BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA
0.6
A2 Carped
Carp
A2
0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2
0.2
0.0
0
0.0.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BFGS
BFGS
8
log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)
Figure 2: Bootstrapped empirical cumulative distribution of the number of objective function evaluations
divided by dimension (FEvals/DIM) for 51 targets with target precision in 10[−8..2] for all functions and
subgroups in 5-D. The “best 2009” line corresponds to the best aRT observed during BBOB 2009 for each
selected target.