Carpe Diem Report.pdf


Aperçu du fichier PDF carpe-diem-report.pdf - page 6/8

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Aperçu texte


0.8

moderate fcts
best 2009
2009
best

bbob - f1-f5, 20-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances

BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA

0.6
A2 Carped
Carp
A2

0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2

0.2
0.0
0

0.0.0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

BFGS
BFGS

Proportion of function+target pairs

Proportion of function+target pairs

separable fcts
1.0

1.0
0.8

BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA

0.6
A2 Carped
Carp
A2

0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2

0.2
0.0
0

8

0.0.0

1

log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)

2

bbob - f10-f14, 20-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances

BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA

0.6
BFGS
BFGS

0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2

0.2
0.0
0

0.0.0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

A2
A2 Carped
Carp

1.0
0.8

0.4
BFGS
BFGS

0.0.0

3

4

5

6

7

log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)

A2
A2 Carped
Carp

8

Proportion of function+target pairs

Proportion of function+target pairs

A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2

0.2

best 2009
2009
best

A2 Carped
Carp
A2

0.4
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2

0.2
0.0.0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

BFGS
BFGS

8

all functions

0.6

2

BFGS
BFGS

8

log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)

best 2009
2009
best

1

7

0.6

0.0
0

8

BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA

bbob - f20-f24, 20-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances

0.0
0

6

BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA

log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)

0.8

5

bbob - f15-f19, 20-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances

weakly structured multi-modal fcts
1.0

4

multi-modal fcts
best 2009
2009
best

Proportion of function+target pairs

Proportion of function+target pairs

0.8

3

log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)

ill-conditioned fcts
1.0

best 2009
2009
best

bbob - f6-f9, 20-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances

1.0
0.8

best 2009
2009
best

bbob - f1-f24, 20-D
51 targets in 100..1e-08
15 instances

BIPOP-C
BIPOP-CMA

0.6
A2 Zoubab
Zoub
A2

0.4
BFGS
BFGS

0.2
0.0
0

0.0.0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

A2
A2 Carped
Carp

8

log10 of (# f-evals / dimension)

Figure 3: Bootstrapped empirical cumulative distribution of the number of objective function evaluations
divided by dimension (FEvals/DIM) for 51 targets with target precision in 10[−8..2] for all functions and
subgroups in 20-D. The “best 2009” line corresponds to the best aRT observed during BBOB 2009 for each
selected target.