UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights lao pdr end of mission statement.pdf


Aperçu du fichier PDF fichier-pdf-sans-nom.pdf - page 2/23

Page 1 23423


Aperçu texte


processes including ones with profound impacts on their lives, and are deeply disadvantaged in relation to
education, access to formal work, and positions of authority. Ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples
continue to experience poverty at a vastly higher rate than the Lao-Tai majority. People in rural areas
have been left behind by economic progress, and account for almost 90 percent of those in poverty.5 In
my visits to Vientiane, Attapeu, Champasack, Xienkuang, and Houaphanh, I was struck by the depth of
these challenges.
Nowhere was this more apparent than in Attapeu, where I visited three temporary camps for survivors of
the 2018 Xe-Pian Xe-Namnoy dam collapse—Hadyao, Tamayord, and Dong Ban—as well as a village
devastated by the collapse, Mai Village. I witnessed the strength and courage of those affected by the
disaster, and saw firsthand the dispiriting conditions which people will have to endure for at least three
years and possibly longer. In the Huamueang district of the Houaphanh Province, I visited the villages of
Phanang, Pahkatai, and Mon, and met with community members whose needs are as basic as electricity
for a village, adequate water, and reasonable road access during the rainy season. I also met with
healthcare workers, farmers, weavers, school teachers, Village Education Development Committees,
representatives of the Lao Women’s Union, and village leaders, in addition to government officials at the
district, provincial, and national levels.
Both in relation to the situation in Attapeu, but also more generally in the Government’s overall approach,
one thing stands out. It is the stark contrast between the theory and the reality. Regarding Attapeu, a
senior official of the Ministry of Energy and Mines described the elaborate and very positive conditions
which would govern resettlement and ensure enhanced livelihood opportunities. On the ground, I saw and
heard nothing that remotely resembled that description. More generally, the Government has produced
many impressive pieces of legislation and adopted elaborate policy statements, often in conjunction with
foreign partners. But meaningful implementation is all too often lacking. Quotas are set but not enforced,
conditions are attached but not monitored, new approaches are launched but business continues as usual.
This disconnect is greatly facilitated by a determination that the Party should remain firmly in control of
public dialogue, an assiduously maintained lack of transparency in most realms, a reluctance to permit
criticism, the absence of meaningful complaint mechanisms, the marginality of the judicial system for
anything to do with people’s rights, the comprehensive government management of the media, the tight
regulation of any potentially independent civil society, and the firm leash kept on foreign aid. The result
is that efforts to promote meaningful consultation, to encourage participation in decision-making, to enlist
genuine advice and criticism, or to propose alternative approaches, are all rendered difficult, if not
impossible.
The plight of civil society is perhaps the most obvious manifestation of this problem. The government has
very effectively shut down space for robust discussion and accountability. All Lao groups are required to
register as “non-profit associations” (NPAs) and, along with INGOs, are highly regulated and
comprehensively monitored. In addition, high profile instances of intimidation, arrests, and
disappearances of people who have pushed ever so gently against the envelope send chilling and highly
effective messages to people who want to contribute to addressing important and complex public issues.
A single-minded focus on preserving power and controlling public discussion has precluded important
conversations and robbed Lao people of a meaningful say in the solutions to widespread social problems.
Although these problems have tended to elude the radar of major human rights organizations and the
mainstream media, UN treaty bodies have made clear references to them but without significant effect to
date.


5

World Bank, “Poverty Profile in Lao PDR,” 2014, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/868521467998508506/pdf/100120-WP-P146141-PUBLICBox393225B-Poverty-Profile-in-Lao-PDR-publication-version-12-19-14.pdf p. 9.

2