Cet outil permet de trouver un fichier parmi les documents publics partagés par les utilisateurs de Fichier-PDF.fr.
Dernière mise à jour de la base de données: 05 février à 03:00 - Environ 380000 fichiers indexés.
Vol.4, No.8, 645-654 Published Online August 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/psych) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.48092 Clinical EFT as an Evidence-Based Practice for the Treatment of Psychological and Physiological Conditions Dawson Church National Institute for Integrative Healthcare, Fulton, USA Email:
Lois Addy Occupational Therapy Evidence in Practice for Physical Rehabilitation 2007 Occupational Therapy Evidence in Practice for Physical Rehabilitation AOT_PR.indd i 8/19/2006 10:02:31 AM AOT_PR.indd ii 8/19/2006 10:02:31 AM Occupational Therapy Evidence in Practice for Physical Rehabilitation Edited by Lois M.
Summarize and update current evidence for the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in pediatric allergic asthma.
A critical study of the evidence of experience does not have to imply metaphysical or epistemological foundationalism, as Scott claims, but on the contrary, such a study is indispensable for challenging them.
Adequacy of Evidence for Physical Activity Adequacy of Evidence for Physical Activity Guidelines Development:
fMRI meta-analysis evidence toward new perspectives in sexual medicine ORTIGUE, Stéphanie, et al.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) publishes practice guides in education to bring the best available evidence and expertise to bear on the types of systemic challenges that cannot currently be addressed by single interventions or programs.
Evidence-based recommendations are needed to guide the acute management of the bleeding trauma patient.
Red meat After thoroughly reviewing the accumulated scientific literature, a Working Group of 22 experts from 10 countries convened by the IARC Monographs Programme classified the consumption of red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), based on limited evidence that the consumption of red meat causes cancer in humans and strong mechanistic evidence supporting a carcinogenic effect.
Despite the strong twin rationales of improving efficacy and reducing resistance development, the evidence supporting this strategy remains controversial.
For this review, we focus on evidence from randomized, controlled studies that met the following criteria:
Evidence of Coal Fly Ash Toxic Chemical Geoengineering Int.
With the increasing awareness of bisphosphonates amongst racehorse trainers, owners and veterinarians, it is prudent to examine the existing evidence to determine if this class of drugs has a place in the off-label treatment of orthopaedic disorders of young and/or racing Thoroughbreds.
Morrison, Paul Hutton, David Shiers and Douglas Turkington Summary Evidence regarding overestimation of the efficacy of antipsychotics and underestimation of their toxicity, as well as emerging data regarding alternative treatment options, suggests it may be time to introduce patient choice and reconsider whether everyone who meets the criteria for a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis requires antipsychotics in order to recover.
This mini-review aims to provide the summary of evidence of a single question and its outcomes with limited scope as described by Griffiths (2002).
The aim of this review is to outline these implications by (i) reviewing evidence for the link between creativity and BD, (ii) developing a provisional model of mechanisms underpinning the creativity–BD link, (iii) describing unique challenges faced by creative-BD populations, and (iv) systematically considering evidence-based psychosocial treatments in the light of this review.
Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated.
Although there is evidence that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) can reduce pain, the mechanisms involved are not well established.
The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to critically appraise study quality, and the National Health and Medical Research Council Level of Evidence Scale to rank the level of the evidence.