Verandas for Residual and Emergent Narratives

Texte de la première page
University of Sfax, Tunisia
Faculty of Arts and Humanities
The English Department and the Laboratory on Approaches to Discourse (LAD) jointly
organise on 14 April 2017 a study day on:
Verandas for Residual and Emergent Narratives
In Marxism and Literature, Raymond Williams foregrounds cultural change and explores it by
theorising “terms which recognise not only ‘stages’ and ‘variations’ but the internal dynamic relations
of any actual process” (121). Through introducing “the dominant,” “the residual” and “the emergent,”
Williams studies culture and history in terms of power and resistance, or, to use his own terms,
“hegemony” and “counter hegemony.” In so doing, he proposes an alternative reading of history from
the perspective of the marginalised, emphasising the subversive roles of the “residual” and the
“emergent,” which are “significant both in themselves and in what they reveal of the characteristics of
the ‘dominant’” (122). The dominant is closely associated with the hegemonic group which “has
effectively seized [. . .] the ruling definition of the social” (125). The residual, Williams explains, “has
been effectively formed in the past, but it is still active in the cultural process, not only and often not at
all as an element of the past, but as an effective element of the present” (122). The emergent, however,
is more subversive as it could change the dominant cultural formations and structures. The emergent,
in Williams’ words, means the creation of “new meanings and values, new practices, new
relationships and kinds of relationship” (123). In relation to the dominant, these are “substantially
alternative or oppositional to it: emergent in the strict sense, rather than merely novel” (123).
Emergent tendencies translate themselves in deviations and excesses as they posit a different
understanding of the world and create new forms of knowledge.
The significance of Williams’ theorisation of the dominant, the residual, and the emergent lies in the
reconsideration of our understanding of culture and the introduction of a tripartite ideological
framework that introduces new interpretative possibilities. This framework could be used as a critical
strategy to understand how the residual and the emergent find a space in the literary text and challenge
the regulations and structures of the dominant. Verandas is a literature research platform that
addresses how the residual and the emergent circumvent the dictates of the dominant/the hegemonic as
it gives an airing to what is stifled and repressed and contributes to the construction of alternative
discursive levels that revalue the role of the “other” in the formation of knowledge.
Contributors may explore, but are not restricted to, the following topics:
●The residual and the emergent in the history of British and American literature
●The residual and the emergent in literary movements
●The residual and the emergent in the literary text
●The residual and the emergent in literary theories
●Postcolonial and diasporic literature and the emergence of new cultural identities
Please send your abstract of no more than 300 words, along with a short bio, to
mounir_guirat@yahoo.co.uk by 15 March 2017.
Notification of acceptance/rejection: 22 March 2017.
Faculty of Arts and Humanities
The English Department and the Laboratory on Approaches to Discourse (LAD) jointly
organise on 14 April 2017 a study day on:
Verandas for Residual and Emergent Narratives
In Marxism and Literature, Raymond Williams foregrounds cultural change and explores it by
theorising “terms which recognise not only ‘stages’ and ‘variations’ but the internal dynamic relations
of any actual process” (121). Through introducing “the dominant,” “the residual” and “the emergent,”
Williams studies culture and history in terms of power and resistance, or, to use his own terms,
“hegemony” and “counter hegemony.” In so doing, he proposes an alternative reading of history from
the perspective of the marginalised, emphasising the subversive roles of the “residual” and the
“emergent,” which are “significant both in themselves and in what they reveal of the characteristics of
the ‘dominant’” (122). The dominant is closely associated with the hegemonic group which “has
effectively seized [. . .] the ruling definition of the social” (125). The residual, Williams explains, “has
been effectively formed in the past, but it is still active in the cultural process, not only and often not at
all as an element of the past, but as an effective element of the present” (122). The emergent, however,
is more subversive as it could change the dominant cultural formations and structures. The emergent,
in Williams’ words, means the creation of “new meanings and values, new practices, new
relationships and kinds of relationship” (123). In relation to the dominant, these are “substantially
alternative or oppositional to it: emergent in the strict sense, rather than merely novel” (123).
Emergent tendencies translate themselves in deviations and excesses as they posit a different
understanding of the world and create new forms of knowledge.
The significance of Williams’ theorisation of the dominant, the residual, and the emergent lies in the
reconsideration of our understanding of culture and the introduction of a tripartite ideological
framework that introduces new interpretative possibilities. This framework could be used as a critical
strategy to understand how the residual and the emergent find a space in the literary text and challenge
the regulations and structures of the dominant. Verandas is a literature research platform that
addresses how the residual and the emergent circumvent the dictates of the dominant/the hegemonic as
it gives an airing to what is stifled and repressed and contributes to the construction of alternative
discursive levels that revalue the role of the “other” in the formation of knowledge.
Contributors may explore, but are not restricted to, the following topics:
●The residual and the emergent in the history of British and American literature
●The residual and the emergent in literary movements
●The residual and the emergent in the literary text
●The residual and the emergent in literary theories
●Postcolonial and diasporic literature and the emergence of new cultural identities
Please send your abstract of no more than 300 words, along with a short bio, to
mounir_guirat@yahoo.co.uk by 15 March 2017.
Notification of acceptance/rejection: 22 March 2017.
Partager ce document
Télécharger le fichier

Faire un lien vers ce document
Lien permanentpour un message, un forum, un réseau social
Lien courtpour un SMS ou un profil
Code HTMLpour un site ou un blog
Du même auteur
- History & Memory Conference (1)05/04/2018
- TATE CONFERENCE05/04/2018
- SAGE-JUSTECH-training session 205/04/2018
- call for papers21/03/2018
- Study Day Leaflet 105/02/2018
- colloquium EN23/01/2018
- 13th Session prog in en 123/01/2018
- Trauma programme16/11/2017
Voir les autres documents de cet auteur
- 2017-2018-SYFLAT-LAD-monthly-seminars 129/09/2017
- Poetics and of Performance call for papers 129/09/2017
- Study Day Programme10/04/2017
- contest-program121/02/2017
- Procedure Granada PhD10/02/2017
- Reading-call-for-papers-ISSHJ-final-1-02/02/2017
- Study Day February 424/01/2017
- sfl (1) (1)17/01/2017
- Programme14/12/2016
- Call for Papers (1)13/12/2016
- The displaced agenda Final 110/12/2016
- Manuscript Preparation Guidelines21/11/2016
Sur le même sujet
Les mots qui reviennent le plus dans ce document. Chacun lance une recherche dans les fichiers publics.
